Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7164 13
Original file (NR7164 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

BIG
Docket No: 7164-13
30 July 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

To: Secretary of the Navy
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 |

(ob) SECNAVINST 1910.4B
(c) 10 U.S.C. 654 (Repeal)

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 6 Jun 13 w/attachments
(2) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that his reason and authority

for separation (unfitness ~ homosexual acts) be changed. He
further requested that his undesirable characterization of
service issued on 4 December 1959 be changed to honorable.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bey, Boyd, and Zsalman,
‘reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29
July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the

limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted ail
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

-b. Although enclosure (1) was not filed in a timely manner, |
it is in the interest of justice to waive the statute of
limitations and review the application on its merits.
c. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy and began a period of
active duty on 3 January 1957. He was not the subject of any
disciplinary action and promoted in due course to pay grade E-4.
He then admitted he had participated in homosexual acts with
civilians off base and Sailors aboard a Naval vessel. His

commanding officer forwarded his case recommending an
undesirable characterization of service due to unfitness
(homosexual acts). The separation authority directed an
undesirable characterization of service discharge due to
unfitness (homosexual acts). He was so discharged on 4 Décember
1959,

d. Reference (b) sets forth the Department of the Navy's

policies, standards, and procedures for administratively ae
separating enlisted service members due to hondsexuality. il
Reference (c) set® forth the Department of the Navy's policies,
standards, and procedures for correction of military records
following the “Don’t ask, don’t tell” (DADT) repeal of 10 U.S.C.
654. It also provides service discharge review boards with the
authority to grant requests to change the narrative reason for
separation to “Secretarial Authority” when the original
discharge was based solely on DADT or a similar policy in place
prior to enactment of it and there are no aggravating factors in
the record, such as misconduct.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of reference (c), the Board concludes that
Petitioner's request warrants favorable action in the form of
limited relief.

The Board concludes that based upon his overall record of
service and the Navy’s policy as established in reference (c),
that a fully honorable discharge is not warranted in light of
the aggravation in this case, homosexual acts aboard a Naval
vessel. However, as a matter of clemency, his undesirable
characterization of service should be upgraded to general under
honorable conditions. The Board further finds that his reason
and authority for separation should be changed to “Secretarial
Authority”. In view of the above, the Board directs the
following limited corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. “That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that

the reason and authority for separation is “Secretarial
Authority” vice unfitness (homosexual acts), and his undesirable
characterization of service be changed to general under
honorable conditions, which were issued on 4 December 1959..

b. That no further relief be granted.

c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

dad. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner’s naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner’s naval record.

e. That, upon request, the Department of Veterans Affairs
be informed that Petitioner's application was received by the
Board on 17 July 2013.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c}, of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. 4SALMAN BRIAN J. GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6({e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6 (e)}
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3106 13

    Original file (NR3106 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the Majority is willing to overlook the aggravating factors of the acts, and given his conduct average of 3.5, the majority concludes that a general characterization of service is 2 warranted. The majority concludes that based upon the Navy’s policy as established in reference (c), that relief in the form of his narrative reason for separation be changed to Secretarial Authority. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 5 February 1960, he was issued a general...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11137 12

    Original file (11137 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 BUG Docket No: 11137-12 4 December 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ow ears acm. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his general...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00436 12

    Original file (00436 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his undesirable characterization of service issued 27 April 1962, be upgraded. He was so discharged on 27 April 1962. d. Reference (b) sets forth the Department of the Navy's policies, standards, and procedures for administratively separating service members due to homosexuality. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5406 13

    Original file (NR5406 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dixit and Zsalman, and Ms. Davis, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Although the Board recognizes Petitioner's participation in homosexual activities occurred aboard ship, and as such is an aggravating factor, it...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3295-13

    Original file (NR3295-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    654 (Repeal) Enel: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Subject's naval record 1.° Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that her narrative reason for separation (Unfitness) issued on 23 May 1951, be changed to “Secretarial Authority”. d. Reference (b) sets forth the Department of the Navy's policies, standards, and procedures for administratively separating enlisted service...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04900 12

    Original file (04900 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In your case, the Board found aggravating factors.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06537-12

    Original file (06537-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his characterization of service “conditions other than honorable” be changed per reference (b). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 July 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04144-12

    Original file (04144-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2013. As a result of the ONI investigation, on 25 September 1968, administrative discharge action was initiated and it was recommended that you receive an undesirable discharge by reason of unfitness due to engaging in a homosexual act on 15 July 1968. In your case, the Board found an aggravating factor.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03294-12

    Original file (03294-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 February 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below Should be taken on the available evidence of record. The discharge authority approved and directed an UD discharge due to unfitness (homosexuality). CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the Board concludes that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR304 13

    Original file (NR304 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SJN Docket No: 00304-13 24 October 2013 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF’ Ref: fa) 10 U.8